Judgement Demo

Judgement Name:
To Date:(dd/mm/yyyy)
Form Date:(dd/mm/yyyy)

Free Judgements Access Here..
Judgment Name :T.RAVI & ANR Vs. B.CHINNA NARASIMHA & ORS. ETC.
Coram :ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
Date of Judgement:21 Mar 17

Judgement:ARUN MISHRA, J.
1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 23864-23865 of 2011.
2. In the appeals, the final decree which has been drawn up in a partition suit with respect to item No.6 of Schedule ‘B’ pertaining to land a

Judgment Name :M/S. BRAKEWEL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Vs. P.R. SELVAM ALAGAPPAN
Coram :ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
Date of Judgement:21 Mar 17

Judgement:AMITAVA ROY,J.
Leave granted.
2. The subject matter of impeachment is the order dated 3.6.2016 rendered in CRP (NPD) 1499 of 2016 and CMP No. 8225 of 2016 by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, there

Judgment Name :BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. MAZDOOR SANGH (BMS) ETC. Vs. BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ETC.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:21 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.:
Leave granted.
The appellants are the petitioners/applicants before the learned Single Judge in an application filed by them for taking appropriate action against the respondents herein for violating the order dated

Judgment Name :DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. MANISH AND ORS
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:20 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of

Judgment Name :MAHESH SINGH KISHOR SINGH Vs. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NAGPUR AREA, W.C.L., KASTURBA NAGAR AND ANR
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:20 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. In the nature of order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. The appellant is aggrieved, since his representation dated

Judgment Name :PARVEZ AKHTAR Vs. AVIGO TRUSTEE COMPANY PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:10 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on both sides that they have settled their disputes outside the Court and the settlement agreement has been filed before this Court by way o

Judgment Name :PUNJAB STATE AND ORS. Vs. BIMLA DEVI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:10 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents, since the connected matters (Civil Appeal No. 2145 of 2016 & batch

Judgment Name :DELHI ADMINISTRATION THR. SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ORS. Vs. GAURAV SAHNI AND ORS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:10 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of

Judgment Name :INDRAJ (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:10 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. The delay is condoned on the condition that the appellants shall not be entitled for any interest for the period covered by the delay before the High Court, if any, and before this Court as well.
2. Leave grant

Judgment Name :IMAX CORPORATION Vs. M/S E-CITY ENTERTAINMENT (I) P.LTD.
Coram :S.A. BOBDE, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Date of Judgement:10 Mar 17

Judgement:S. A. BOBDE, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellant-Imax Corporation has challenged the interim order dated 10.06.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Notice of Motion No.2560 of 2008 in the Arbitr

Judgment Name :MCDOWELL & COMPANY LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE
Coram :A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:A. K. SIKRI, J.
This appeal is preferred against judgment dated 05.04.2005 of the High Court of Karnataka whereby the appeal of Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) was allowed setting aside the order to the Inc

Judgment Name :DINESH YADAV Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
Coram :DIPAK MISRA, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.
1. The judgment dated 18th April, 2016 in Criminal Appeal No. 820 of 2004 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed on Dinesh Yadav, accus

Judgment Name :ANANDA BAPU PUNDE @ KOLI Vs. BALASAHEB ANNA KOLI & ORS.
Coram :ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
1. Respondent Nos.1 and 2, husband and mother-in-law of one Poonam were tried for having committed her murder within 7 years of marriage with the Respondent No.1. According to the prosecution, at about 8

Judgment Name :ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs. BABY RADHIKA GUPTA AND ANR
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, A.M. KHANWILKAR
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. This is an appeal filed by the appellant/insurance company aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court declining to interfere with the order passed in execution by the Motor Accident Claims

Judgment Name :HUSSAIN AND ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
Coram :ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
I 1. Leave granted. Grievance in these appeals is against denial of bail pending trial/appeal where appellants have been in custody for a long period.
2. In t

Judgment Name :CHHATTISGARH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ANR Vs. M/S AMAR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ORS
Coram :ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:1. Leave granted.
2. The appeals have been preferred by Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (in short, 'the CSIDC') and M/s. Raipur Construction Pvt. Ltd. being aggrieved by the judgment and o

Judgment Name :NOOR NAGAR EXT. WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. Vs. ORUJ AHMAD & ORS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
These appeals have been filed against the common judgment dated 7th July, 2005 of Madras High Court in Appeal Suit(AS) No.851 of 1989 and Appeal Suit (AS)No.606 of 1989. These appeals arise out of Origina

Judgment Name :K.S. PALANISAMI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. Vs. HINDU COMMUNITY,CITIZENS OF GOBICHE.&ORS
Coram :A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
These appeals have been filed against the common judgment dated 7th July, 2005 of Madras High Court in Appeal Suit(AS) No.851 of 1989 and Appeal Suit (AS)No.606 of 1989. These appeals arise out of Origina

Judgment Name :ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs. BABY RADHIKA GUPTA AND ANR
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, A.M. KHANWILKAR
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J. Leave granted. 2. This is an appeal filed by the appellant/insurance company aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court declining to interfere with the order passed in execution by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
Judgment Name :HUSSAIN AND ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
Coram :ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
I 1. Leave granted. Grievance in these appeals is against denial of bail pending trial/appeal where appellants have been in custody for a long period.
2. In

Judgment Name :NOOR NAGAR EXT. WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR. Vs. ORUJ AHMAD & ORS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to go into the merits of the matter.
3. The appellants in this appeal were the defendants in CS(OS) No. 2310 of 2011

Judgment Name :K.S. PALANISAMI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. Vs. HINDU COMMUNITY,CITIZENS OF GOBICHE.&ORS
Coram :A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
These appeals have been filed against the common judgment dated 7th July, 2005 of Madras High Court in Appeal Suit(AS) No.851 of 1989 and Appeal Suit (AS)No.606 of 1989. These appeals arise out of Original

Judgment Name :BISHU SARKAR & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Coram :ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Date of Judgement:09 Mar 17

Judgement:Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 06.06.2006 passed by Calcutta High Court in Criminal Appeal No.255/2000.
Six persons namely Tarit Kundu, Bishu Sarkar, Sahadeb Sarkar,

Judgment Name :PAWAN @ RAJINDER SINGH AND ANR Vs. STATE OF HAYRANA
Coram :N.V. RAMANA, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:08 Mar 17

Judgement:Prafulla C. Pant, J.
This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 02.04.2014, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. D-391- DB of 2002 whereby said Court has dismissed the appeal a

Judgment Name :AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. BHUSHAN LAL
Coram :R. BANUMATHI, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
Date of Judgement:08 Mar 17

Judgement:R. BANUMATHI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. Two eviction petitions were filed by the appellants-landlords before the Rent Controller, Ambala Cant. The Rent Controller and the App

Judgment Name :SIGNODE INDIA LIMITED Vs. COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE & CUSTOMS-II
Coram :RANJAN GOGOI, NAVIN SINHA
Date of Judgement:08 Mar 17

Judgement:RANJAN GOGOI, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the relevant material.
2. The liability of the appellant to service tax on the basis that the service rendered by the appellant amounts to “ca

Judgment Name :SUMAN SINGH Vs. SANJAY SINGH
Coram :R.K. AGRAWAL, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Date of Judgement:08 Mar 17

Judgement:Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1) These appeals are filed by the appellant (wife) against the final judgment and order dated 23.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in F.A.O. No.108 of 2013 and F.A.O. No.109 of 2013 by

Judgment Name :NATIONAL INS.CO.LTD. Vs. REKHABEN & ORS.
Coram :S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement: Civil Appeal No. 8867 of 2012
1. The appellant–Insurance Company has preferred this appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 28/29.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in First Appeal No.736 of 2012, wh

Judgment Name :PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN & ORS. Vs. MANAGER, CANARA BANK & ORS.
Coram :MADAN B. LOKUR, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:Madan B. Lokur, J.
1. In these appeals a very short question has arisen, namely, whether a complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act’). The National

Judgment Name :UTTAR PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Vs. ARUN KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellants are before us, aggrieved by the interim order passed by the High Court dated 19.12.2016 passed in Writ Petition No.28986 of 2016.
3. As we propose to remit the mat

Judgment Name :COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF ARTISTS AND TECHNICIANS OF W B FILM AND TELEVISION AN
Coram :A.K. SIKRI, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:A.K. SIKRI, J.
This appeal raises an interesting and important question of law touching upon the width and scope of jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (for short, the ‘CCI’) under Section 3 of

Judgment Name :FARIDABAD COMPLEX ADMINISTRATION Vs. M/S. IRON MASTER INDIA (P) LTD.
Coram :R.K. AGRAWAL, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1) This appeal is filed by the appellant(defendant) against the final judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.S.A. No. 530 of 200

Judgment Name :PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN & ORS. Vs. MANAGER, CANARA BANK & ORS.
Coram :MADAN B. LOKUR, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:Madan B. Lokur, J.
1. In these appeals a very short question has arisen, namely, whether a complaint can be filed by a Trust under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘the Act’). The National

Judgment Name :MOHAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
Coram :R.K. AGRAWAL, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1) This appeal is filed by plaintiff No.1 against the judgment and final order dated 24.01.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench at Gwalior in First Appeal No. 3 of 19

Judgment Name :UTTAR PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Vs. ARUN KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellants are before us, aggrieved by the interim order passed by the High Court dated 19.12.2016 passed in Writ Petition No.28986 of 2016.
3. As we propose to remit the ma

Judgment Name :NATIONAL INS.CO.LTD. Vs. REKHABEN & ORS.
Coram :S.A. BOBDE, L. NAGESWARA RAO
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:S. A. BOBDE, J.
Civil Appeal No. 8867 of 2012
1. The appellant–Insurance Company has preferred this appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 28/29.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in First App

Judgment Name :NATIONAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY LTD. Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Coram :PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Date of Judgement:07 Mar 17

Judgement:R.F. Nariman, J.
1. The present appeal raises an interesting question as to whether an administrative circular that is issued by SEBI under Section 11(1) of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, can be the subject m

Judgment Name :STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ETC ETC Vs. HEMANT RAI ETC ETC
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:06 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents.
4. This Court by Judgment dated 11.01.2017 in Civil Appeal

Judgment Name :A.KANTHAMANI Vs. NASREEN AHMED
Coram :R.K. AGRAWAL, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
Date of Judgement:06 Mar 17

Judgement:Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.
1) This appeal is filed by the defendant against the judgment and final order dated 27.10.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in A.S. No. 127 of 2000 by which the High Court dismissed the appe

Judgment Name :SASI (D) THR LRS Vs. ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR AND ORS
Coram :DIPAK MISRA, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
Date of Judgement:03 Mar 17

Judgement: In this special leave petition, the challenge is to the order dated 9th March, 2012, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in R.S.A. No.345 of 2012 and the order dated 26th October, 2016,
Judgment Name :VISHNU Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:03 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been in custody since 01.12.2015 in connection with Case No. 238 of 2015 registered at Police Station Bair, Rajasthan under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 325, 307 I

Judgment Name :BHOGIREDDI VARALAKSHMI & ORS Vs. MANI MUTHUPANDI AND ORS
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:03 Mar 17

Judgement:Aggrieved by the inadequacy of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) and the High Court, the petitioners have filed this Special Leave Petition. Taking note of the fact that the decease
Judgment Name :M.G. ESHWARAPPA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Coram :N.V. RAMANA, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:02 Mar 17

Judgement:Prafulla C. Pant, J.
This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 07.02.2006, passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Appeal No. 1055 of 1999 whereby the High Court has allowed the appeal filed by the State, and

Judgment Name :DNYANDEO SABAJI NAIK AND ANR. Vs. PRADNYA PRAKASH KHADEKAR AND ORS.
Coram :JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Date of Judgement:01 Mar 17

Judgement:Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J
1. The Special Leave Petitions in the present case arise from three orders of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a First Appeal:
(i) an order dated 22 November 2013 by which a year’s time w

Judgment Name :JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs. KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED AND ORS.
Coram :MADAN B. LOKUR, DEEPAK GUPTA
Date of Judgement:01 Mar 17

Judgement:DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
Leave granted.
2. These two Civil Appeals are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court dated 14th July, 2016, whereby Writ Petition No.4895 of 2016, filed by th

Judgment Name :N.PARAMESWARAN UNNI Vs. G.KANNAN & ANR
Coram :N.V. RAMANA, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:01 Mar 17

Judgement:N.V. Ramana, j.
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 06-10-2003 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Revision Petition No. 644 of 1995 whereby the High Court al

Judgment Name :THE MANAGEMENT OF STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SMITA SHARAD DESHMUKH & ANR.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, A.M. KHANWILKAR
Date of Judgement:01 Mar 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.:
Leave granted.
The appellant (hereinafter referred to as “the Management”) is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court whereby the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the employee”) was d

Judgment Name :BHAGWATI @ REENA Vs. ANIL CHOUBEY
Coram :N.V. RAMANA, PRAFULLA C. PANT
Date of Judgement:01 Mar 17

Judgement:Leave granted.
2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/wife questioning the order dated 06-05-2015 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in First Appeal No. 623 of 2005 whereby the High Court confi

Judgment Name :S. K. CONTAINERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Vs. SUSMITA BHATTACHARYA & ORS.
Coram :KURIAN JOSEPH, R. BANUMATHI
Date of Judgement:28 Feb 17

Judgement:KURIAN, J.
We do not find any contumacious conduct on the part of the respondents/alleged contemnors. The contempt petition is dismissed.
2. Civil Appeal No. 2318/2014 is taken on Board.
3. Heard learned co

Judgment Name :RAJAGOPAL Vs. MUTHUPANDI @ THAVAKKALAI & ORS.
Coram :ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
Date of Judgement:28 Feb 17

Judgement:R.F. Nariman, J.
1) The facts in the present case are as follows:-
i) Five accused persons, armed with deadly weapons, attacked and injured Rajagopal (PW-1) at about 2.30 p.m. on 06.11.1999, who was standing at the Kandavilai


Supreme Court judgements finder is a computer based software containing the judgements and orders of the supreme court from 1950-2017 :

Features:

■ Easy to keep track of clients:

Judgment Manager makes tracking clients very easy. The database is able to hold an unlimited amount of cases without the the need to purchase another license.

■ Powerful, Stable & Secure Database:

The data contained inside your database is safe from prying eyes. Judgment Manager comes with a highly encrypted and secure database.

■ No training or user guide needed:

Judgment Manager is so easy to use that the lead developers 9 year child was able to use the software with no user guide. This is because of the in your face layout clean layout.

■ Easy reporting features:

Judgment Manager contains simple reports in order to help you look up the cases in the databases to locating a certain bank connected to a debtors record.

■ Maintain Court & Sheriff Information in the database:

Judgment Manager allows you to store important courthouse information within the database for quick access.

■ Great exporting features:

Users are able to export case details to Excel or Word.